One of the most significant features of the new edition of Dictionary of Paul and His Letters is that, as in the 1993 edition, there is an extensive essay on each of Paul's letters. These deal with the usual introductory questions of author, recipients socio-historical context, date and place of writing, purpose, aim and style of the letter, identifying leading theological themes, and generally making the best historical and theological sense of each particular letter.
When Hawthorne wrote in 1993 he did so as a leading evangelical commentator on Philippians - his Word commentary was published in 1983. His primary concerns addressed most of the introductory questions of the time, with considerable focus on where the letter was written, its integrity as a single letter whose author was Paul, and identifying Paul's opponents.
His treatment of the theology of the letter largely featured the Christ-hymn, sanctification as Christian maturing in Christ, and the pervasive tone of joy. The article still reads well, but unsurprisingly feels dated and thin on areas of study now deemed crucial to our understanding of what Paul was about in writing a letter like this to a church like Philippi, given the personal history between Paul and the community of believers in Philippi.
In the intervening 30 years several new questions and approaches have come in for consideration: history of interpretation, rhetorical criticism, literary structure, and overall a more rigorous examination of the social realities of the city, the Empire, and the demographics of small house churches opting out of the civic and religious mainstream. These more recent developments have reshaped the study of Philippians and guide the treatment of the letter in the new edition.
Jeannine Brown's treatment extends to 19 columns compared to Hawthorne's 14, indicating the widening range of 21st Century biblical studies. One immediate impression in comparing the two articles is that Brown reflects the increased contemporary interest in theological interpretation. Compared with Hawthorne's treatment the theological themes she identifies are more extensive, clearly traced and give a more nuanced account of the contextual, place-specific, and rhetorical effectiveness of Paul's theological arguments in pursuit of unity in missional purpose, and communal harmony in the internal relationships at Phillippi. These are clearly connected to, and derive from, an understanding of the text as it emerges from the realities of first century Philippi. the Roman city, in which small house groups made up the local church, where questions of power and competing loyalties were causing hairline fractures that could widen into community division.
Brown doesn't neglect questions of occasion, and the integrity of the letter as a single missive from Paul. The discussion is brought up to date to take account of new approaches and conclusions such as literary shape and structure, missional thrust, more recent work on the Christ hymn, and the underlying implications for both Christology and cruciform discipleship. Such themes as christology, eschatology, friendship, communal discernment, unity and resilience in suffering, are traced and examined in this urgently written letter.
These matters are mostly mentioned in Hawthorne as well, but Brown has more rigorously tied them to text and context. The new article expounds more effectively the rhetorical how, the theological what, and the pastoral why behind what Paul wrote to this particular church, at this critical stage of its development, reconstructing the existing and hoped for relationships of the church in Philippi to him - and to each other.
Looking over the two bibliographies demonstrates the progress made in 30 years of scholarship on Paul's letter of pastoral concern to the house church believers in Philippi. For example, in 2001 a key monograph was published by Peter Oakes, Philippians. From People to Letter. Here is the first paragraph of a review of what became a model study:
In this engaging and persuasive study Oakes models a method for investigating the social make-up of early Christian communities by focus-ing his attention on the early Pauline community at Philippi. Drawing on archaeological and literary evidence, he sheds light on the diverse range of people within the community while showing that Paul’s letter to the Philippians is a call for unity in the face of economic suffering.1
Then there is the amount of recent work on Philippians 2.6-11, the Christ-hymn. Several names indicate the energy and range of those who continue to mine this text for its meaning and purpose in Philippians. Richard Bauckham's work on Paul's Christology of divine identity, along with the late Larry Hurtado, has opened up further seams of theological interpretation. The late Ralph Martin's edited collection of essays on the Christ-hymn has the telling title, Where Christology Began (1998). Michael Gorman's work on Paul's cruciform theology of discipleship and missional practice is also deeply indebted to Philippians 2.6-11, a text he has explored in several publications, most exactly in his monograph Inhabiting the Cruciform God: Kenosis, Justification and Theosis in Paul's Narrative Soteriology. (2009) In Brown's thought and writing on Philippians, you can detect the fingerprints from each of these contributions, and from the latest research and commentaries.
Finally the list of subjects cross referenced within the Dictionary at the end of each article are important sign-posts. Not everything that is significant can be included in the main article. A list of relevant associated references to articles allows a thorough engagement with the subject being pursued. For example, the cross reference to the article on Christology provides further information on Phil 2.6-11 and places it in the vaster landscape of Pauline Christological reflection ion his other letters. The theme of suffering in Paul has also been an area of recent research and a in the revised Dictionary a very full article by S F Wu reflects back on Philippians and in the wider context of Paul's life and other letters. By the way, I've read both Scot Hafemann (1993) and Siu Fung Wu (2023) on 'Suffering', and am happy to have both of them available. There are theological and pastoral implications in the human experience of suffering that are not so sensitive to changes in scholarly directions.
In this post I've tried to compare these two Dictionaries printed a generation apart by zooming in on a single article with occasional glances aside. The overwhelming sense is that a thorough revision of the Dictionary of Paul and His Letters has been essential, and has been carried off with evident success on multiple levels. In this detailed comparison I've tried to provide a fair examination of one core sample from the overall site of Pauline excavations.2
- Biblical Theology Bulletin, Vol. 35. Issue 4. page 151 (Richard Ayscough)
- The photo of the cross was taken by my friend Graeme Clark, and shows one of the small crosses on the railings of Paisley Abbey. The photo of the cross through the trees is of King's College Aberdeen, taken by me while walking in the rain on campus in an Aberdeen summer! Please do not reproduce the photo of the cross without permission. Thank you
Recent Comments