Hope Rosemary and Stuart don't mind if I pick up their comments and respond in a full post.
Rosemary isn't too impressed with John Wesley's prayer, "Lord let me not live to be useless." But in Wesley's defence Rosemary - he was the catalyst for a movement that has activism as one of its defining characteristics. And though some might argue that his evangelistic and organisational activism was driven by a clamouring ego, there is also a weight of evidence of something in John Wesley that is much more spiritually substantial. One of the key texts of Scripture on which Wesley's theology of Christian perfection drew deeply, was 2 Peter 1.4 which speaks of believers as participants in the divine nature. And the chain of consequences ends in verse 8 of that chapter with the desire to be kept 'from being ineffective and unproductive in [our] knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ.'
Assuming Rosemary, you are referring to Milton's moving poem about his blindness, then yes, the observation he makes to God "They also serve who only stand and wait", has equal claim to being a one line prayer that has its moments of exact appropriateness in all our lives. Though Milton himself was no passive quietist - his writing, social engagement and energetic pursuit of religious liberty, political activism and public service enabled him to live a life as full as that of any Wesley, his personality just as complex, his popularity just as mixed.
But a comparison of prayers, their suitability or otherwise, invites some further reflection - on whether, or in what way someone, whether Wesley, Milton, Julian of Norwich or whoever can be "wrong" in content, intention or articulation of their prayer. Our personal circumstances, unique identity, our place in our family, neighbourhood or culture, the emotional and spiritual state we are in, our personal history - and much else, creates the person we are and out of whom come our prayers - praiseworthy and blameworthy, full formed and half formed, articulate and inarticulate, theologically correct and theologically dodgy, emotionally all over the place or emotionally integrated.
So we pray. We pray out of who we are. And we trust God who knows the heart, to see our intent. I think it's one of the mercies of God that love covers a multitude of sins, that God knows our frame and remembers we are dust, and that in prevenient grace God is there before we ever open our mouths, and long afterwards.
That said, some prayers are wrong. But what kind would they be?
.............................
Stuart asks in his comment about my own favourite one line prayer. I don't have one. There are a number I've used many times in those moments when they fit circumstance precisely, answer inner mood exactly, or say the truth as fully as I can bear it. Here's three of them:
For all that is past, thanks - for all that is to come YES
(Dag Hammarskjold)
Thine eternity dost ever besiege us
(Helen Waddell)
My chains fell off, my heart was free, I rose, went forth, and followed Thee!
(Charles Wesley)
Thank you for your profound response.
Posted by: Stuart | July 21, 2009 at 08:07 AM
Alternatively my favourite one word prayers might be
thanks
sorry
help
wow
particularly wow
Posted by: Craig | July 21, 2009 at 11:40 AM
Well yes, I trusted to you to pick up on my reference. As a friend remarks, half the fun is lost otherwise.
Personally, I find Wesley appealing, and Milton not. And Milton was the real radical - the worst of the charges against Wesley must be that he was not actually radical enough. But he is immensely appealing in his vulnerability. However, our age dreads the inability to be useful, to work, and having to depend on others. And we need to learn to love it. Abba Pambo, dying, said (something like) 'Since I became a monk I have not eaten bread which was not the fruit of my hands, and not spoken one word of which I have needed to repent. I go to my Lord as one who has not even made a start to serve him.'
I think I would pray: Teach me to listen.
Posted by: Rosemary Hannah | July 21, 2009 at 05:15 PM